andyistic said:

What's the progress on that Chavel petition?

---

People want him back?

Sativus said:

People want him back?

---

I do

BTW Dan about time he got the boot lol I cant believe you let him stick around for so long all he did was stir things up and cause trouble.

Agent00 said:

Sativus said:

People want him back?

---

I do

BTW Dan about time he got the boot lol I cant believe you let him stick around for so long all he did was stir things up and cause trouble.

---

ezKiel said:

Well seeing as you didn't leave it alone.


This site is PRIVATELY owned. They can do whatever the fuck they want. Them being fair and nice is just gravy.

No one is holding a gun to your head to visit this site. So unlike the real world where censorship would infringe on your basic rights (not that that stops anyone. but I'll leave that alone) you can leave.

---

You're a fucking moron >>>>>>>><<<<<<<

Lieutenant_Dan said:

I took care of that fucking idiot.

He's gone for good.

---

It's a celebration, bitches!

usg543 said:

It's a celebration, bitches!

---

Ferris said:

Anatomy of a Joke, part 1.

1.  Shroomery has long history of loose censorship policy
2.  User obviously crosses the line
3.  Everyone overreacts, mostly because they seek entertainment
4.  Second user feigns congnitive dissonance.  Re: conventional v post-conventional morality.
5.  Third user takes that person seriously and posts a wanna-be textbook response, with a little added sass.
6.  Second user decides to go for the over the top approach because he assesses that user three won't understand further subtlety.
7.  Fourth user comes to third users rescue because he just wants to say something.
8.  Second user points out that third and fourth probably missed step one and didn't read the statement in the appropriate context.

---

Ferris said:

Anatomy of a Joke, part 1.

1.  Shroomery has long history of loose censorship policy
2.  User obviously crosses the line
3.  Everyone overreacts, mostly because they seek entertainment
4.  Second user feigns congnitive dissonance.  Re: conventional v post-conventional morality.
5.  Third user takes that person seriously and posts a wanna-be textbook response, with a little added sass.
6.  Second user decides to go for the over the top approach because he assesses that user three won't understand further subtlety.
7.  Fourth user comes to third users rescue because he just wants to say something.
8.  Second user points out that third and fourth probably missed step one and didn't read the statement in the appropriate context.

---

ACTUALLY The Real Anatomy of a Joke,

1.  I don't have to know jack shit about Shroomery
2.  Opinionated Asshole really thinks his joke was funny
3.  No one is overreacting at the Growery dude
4.  Use fancy spacing
5.  Irony
6.  Conflict
7.  I slept with your wife
8.  I'm not being serious ...not at all

Ferris said:

congruity in incongruity

and vice versa.

sense in nonsense.

nonsense in sense.

truth seeming to be false.

falsity seeming to be true.

hopeless desires.

wrong seeming to be right.

right seeming to be wrong.

juxtaposition of unlike things.

possible impossibility.

saying one thing and meaning

another.

pretending and deceiving.

Or some of my favorites

blatant vice humor about stereotype humor

contradiction humor about deviation humor

ignorance humor about circularity humor

reduce analogy humor to absurdity

satire of puns

accident humor about accident humor

ambiguity about ambiguity

caricature of caricature

circular humor about circular humor

exaggeration about exaggeration

irony about irony

parody of parody

pun about puns

rationalization of rationalization

satire of satire

---

Ferris said:

I had been awake for 36 hours at that point.  I was starting to get delirious.  Man, my real geniuous sure does peek it's head out when I'm passing out.

---