Welcome to the Growery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!
|
 Gesticnwil
Registered: 10/06/25
Posts: 1
Loc: Australia
Last seen: 25 days, 12 hours
|
 Move from pod question 
#874101 - 11/05/25 04:45 AM (11 months, 14 days ago) |
|
|
hairy armpits and unshaved everything is the default across most of this archive which shocks some younger viewers apparently coz they comment about it. the natural body movement before surgical enhancement became standard gives these old scenes kinetic qualities missing from modern stuff where tits dont move right coz theyre bolted on too tight. the jiggle physics of genuine flesh in 70s blowjob scenes is practically educational compared to the static posing that passes for oral now. sound design too is worth noting coz old porn often had proper music scores sometimes actual jazz musicians working cheap coz nobody respectable would score porn then. those funky basslines and wah guitar noodling underneath seka getting spitroasted creates cognitive dissonance that somehow enhances rather than distracts.
https://vintagepornhome.com/video/3131/black-angelika-in-annina-superstar-2008/
https://retroporn.tube/video/sandwich-club-1/
https://vintageporn.fans/video/rough-vintage-anal-sex-ffm-threesome-for-two-hot-teen/
the 80s synth stuff gets more mocked but in context of the neon and hairspray aesthetic it works as complete sensory package. watching these films as films rather than just jerk material lets u notice craft that gets dismissed coz the subject matter supposedly precludes quality. the best european directors of this era were absolutely making art whether snobs wanna admit it or not and sites that preserve em properly are doing gods work far im concerned.
--------------------
.
Edited by Gesticnwil (10/01/26 05:40 AM)
|
yoosername
Strange
Registered: 06/09/17
Posts: 1,083
Loc: Somewhere under the Sun
Last seen: 45 minutes, 58 seconds
|
Re: Move from pod question [Re: Gesticnwil]
#874102 - 11/05/25 09:43 AM (11 months, 14 days ago) |
|
|
Some brands of peat pods have a stronger mesh that roots can have a hard time getting through.
Sometimes the soil can be too hot nutrient wise, especially if freshly mixed or from a soil company with poor quality control like fox farm.
The most common problem is usually overwatering.
|
yoosername
Strange
Registered: 06/09/17
Posts: 1,083
Loc: Somewhere under the Sun
Last seen: 45 minutes, 58 seconds
|
Re: Move from pod question [Re: Gesticnwil]
#874103 - 11/05/25 09:47 AM (11 months, 14 days ago) |
|
|
Oh, and welcome to the Growery! 
|
lorenntqof
Stranger
Registered: 01/13/26
Posts: 1
Last seen: 8 months, 22 days
|
Re: Move from pod question [Re: Gesticnwil]
#874578 - 01/13/26 04:07 PM (9 months, 7 days ago) |
|
|
It sounds like your seedlings are doing well until the transplant stage, which is pretty common. Make sure to handle the roots gently, keep the soil moist but not soggy, and https://tropical-casino.com/ try to transplant on a cloudy day or in lower light to reduce stress. Hardening them off a bit before moving can also improve survival.
Edited by lorenntqof (01/14/26 04:39 PM)
| |
|
|
|
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Edit 
Reply 
