Home | Community | Message Board


Sporeworks
Please support our sponsors.

Cannabis, Marijuana, Ganja & Greens >> Cannabis Cultivation

Welcome to the Growery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Amazon Shop for: HPS, Hydroponics Supplies

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Invisiblecaptain.koons
Failed Botanist
Registered: 06/25/08
Posts: 6,163
Trusted Cultivator
mh vs hps
    #65709 - 06/25/08 06:24 AM (8 years, 5 months ago)

how much better is switching to hps for flowering?

I read that using metal halide completely will have nearly identical results with your dense buds being denser... less fluffy/pop corn buds too.

you also wouldn't be hassled switching lights

at a local hydroponics shop a mh and hps almost cost the same price (220 for a 1000w or so and 280-300 for a 600w - thats for the bulb and ballast) a conversion bulb is 140 for either I believe so you may as well buy a bulb + ballast)

im unsure as to what I will purchase.


--------------------


TROLLS NEED LOVE TOO!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblecoda


Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 4,734
Trusted Cultivator
Re: mh vs hps [Re: captain.koons]
    #65797 - 06/25/08 01:44 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

HPS provides the spectrum cannabis uses for it's flowering cycle.  MH halide lights have the spectrum ideal for veg.

Both will work just fine, MH lights have the advantage of producing UVB light which increases trichrome production.

If you have the money i'd buy both.  If you want to you can buy a convertible ballast and the appropriate bulbs.  If you're strapped for cash just buy the HPS.


--------------------


MFDoom666: sobriety kills my buzz every time.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblecaptain.koons
Failed Botanist
Registered: 06/25/08
Posts: 6,163
Trusted Cultivator
Re: mh vs hps [Re: coda]
    #65929 - 06/25/08 05:19 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

so MH all the way through would suck?


--------------------


TROLLS NEED LOVE TOO!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblecoda


Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 4,734
Trusted Cultivator
Re: mh vs hps [Re: captain.koons]
    #65932 - 06/25/08 05:23 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

no, it will work ok.  It just won't produce the optimal light spectrum for flowering.  There are a lot of oldschool growers who swear by MH lights.


--------------------


MFDoom666: sobriety kills my buzz every time.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblecaptain.koons
Failed Botanist
Registered: 06/25/08
Posts: 6,163
Trusted Cultivator
Re: mh vs hps [Re: coda]
    #65935 - 06/25/08 05:28 PM (8 years, 5 months ago)

hps would probably be the best bet for me anyways. I want to do a SoG or SCRoG grow.

thanks


--------------------


TROLLS NEED LOVE TOO!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSRH
Male

Registered: 06/15/08
Posts: 33
Re: mh vs hps [Re: captain.koons]
    #82194 - 07/13/08 06:40 PM (8 years, 4 months ago)

get a switchable ballast....
Best of both worlds!!!

especially if you wanna do a SoG or SCRoG grow.

just using just a HPS will stretch your plants out, you wanna try to keep them under 3feet with a SoG or SCRoG grow.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblecaptain.koons
Failed Botanist
Registered: 06/25/08
Posts: 6,163
Trusted Cultivator
Re: mh vs hps [Re: SRH]
    #82200 - 07/13/08 06:43 PM (8 years, 4 months ago)

how do switchable ballasts compare to conversion bulbs cost/effeciency wise?

I think on a 400w hps if u use a mh conversion bulb your down to 350-360w.


--------------------


TROLLS NEED LOVE TOO!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSRH
Male

Registered: 06/15/08
Posts: 33
Re: mh vs hps [Re: captain.koons]
    #82241 - 07/13/08 07:04 PM (8 years, 4 months ago)

well..

Xtrasun 400 watt Halide/Sodium Convertible Ballast  = Suggested Retail: $179.95

Xtrasun 400 watt Halide Ballast = Suggested Retail: $129.95


I've never used retro fit lights so cant help ya there.
I think I paid 250 for my 1000watt xtrasun convertible.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblecaptain.koons
Failed Botanist
Registered: 06/25/08
Posts: 6,163
Trusted Cultivator
Re: mh vs hps [Re: SRH]
    #82311 - 07/13/08 08:14 PM (8 years, 4 months ago)

ill see what's up

I already have 2 x 600w hps /w mag ballasts and a 400w hps / mh conversion

kinda poor after spending like 450$ on nutrients and 180$ on canna coco substrate ;P

maybe ill get a 1kw mh and run everything when im in a house


--------------------


TROLLS NEED LOVE TOO!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

Amazon Shop for: HPS, Hydroponics Supplies

Cannabis, Marijuana, Ganja & Greens >> Cannabis Cultivation

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* mh yeild vs. hps? msmr5150 1,379 9 04/23/09 10:12 AM
by Dr. Penguin
* MH and HPS 400w <30$ Jrsxt 705 3 05/26/08 02:13 PM
by coda
* Lighting Choices 70W HPS or 2 - 40W fluorescent tubes? karma_agent 7,881 8 11/01/08 11:44 PM
by Dr. Penguin
* getting a 400 watt light (hps or mh) ismokeweed 2,494 13 06/08/13 10:17 AM
by SmokeSomeHash
* MH Conversion bulbs t0ad 644 2 11/16/08 11:19 PM
by t0ad
* HPS Light mrspirit 1,589 12 02/04/09 03:44 PM
by Nibin
* Just purchased 400w Ceramic MH. Uns4ne 1,273 11 07/20/08 12:58 PM
by captain.koons
* hps light questions? zenthor 4,034 7 02/01/09 03:24 PM
by Nibin

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: FurrowedBrow, Magash, Dr. Siekadellyk, phychotron
1,601 topic views. 1 members, 163 guests and 28 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Royal Queen Seeds Cannabis Seeds
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2016 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.036 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 14 queries.