Home | Community | Message Board


Sporeworks
Please support our sponsors.

Feedback and Administration >> Growery News Service

Welcome to the Growery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
OfflineShaggy420
Male

Registered: 07/06/10
Posts: 3,372
Last seen: 4 years, 9 months
US: Colorado Supreme Court rejects petition challenging MMJ laws
    #513403 - 01/13/11 05:19 PM (5 years, 10 months ago)

Michael Roberts

Denver Westword

Wednesday 12 Jan 2011
That was fast. Last week, MMJ advocates represented by attorney Andrew Reid petitioned the Colorado Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of the state's medical marijuana laws.

But the Supremes have already rejected this bid, forcing Reid and his clients to take a much slower path through lower courts in order to advance their challenge.

"We're deeply disappointed the Supreme Court didn't take the case, but it's not unexpected," Reid says. "We understand that the court takes very few of these. But we'll do what we have to do to bring it back to the court."

?The petition and its supporting material, on view in their entirety below, argues that the marijuana regulatory measures signed by Governor Bill Ritter in June impinge on patient access to medication and their right to privacy in violation of Amendment 20, which legalized MMJ in Colorado. The petitioners are led by Kathleen Chippi, former owner of One Brown Mouse/Cannabis Healing Arts, who announced in July that she wouldn't sign Colorado's medical marijuana license agreement. She described the document at the time as "downright evil."

At the time of his most recent interview with Westword, Reid hadn't seen paperwork from the Supreme Court about the rejection. Instead, he was informed about the denial by phone. But he notes that the decision "isn't a determination on the merits of the case. It's only the Supreme Court telling us we need to go through lower courts first -- and we're preparing a case to file in lower courts. We'll work our way up as quickly as possible."

Right now, Reid is in the process of targeting the next-best venue for the case. He hopes to reach a conclusion within a week or so, depending on assorted factors.

"My clients are located in Boulder County, but the defendant -- the state government -- is located in Denver, and we have members of the caregivers group throughout the state," he points out. "So that's part of the determination we'll make. And some of it will depend on how quickly we can move through the courts. Some courts are slower than others due to their docket."

As for how quickly the case might be heard, he cites numerous variables.

?"If the case is presented as a purely legal question as to whether or not the medical marijuana legislation is constitutional, and the court is just comparing the language of the constitution with the language of the legislation, that could be heard pretty quickly, because it wouldn't require any additional evidence," Reid maintains. "But the court might want to hear evidence about, say, the injury to the patients due to the interference of access to medication by the legislation, or it might want to hear some evidence about the nature of medical marijuana as a medication in treating specific illnesses.

"For example, if the court makes the determination that it's a life-saving medication for patients with stomach cancer or AIDS, because it controls nausea -- and if it determines that denying them the medication is sentencing them to death -- that may help the court reach a quicker decision."

Whether lower courts agree with his legal takes or not, Reid feels the case, or one like it, will eventually wind up at the Colorado Supreme Court. "There's one case pending in Broomfield and another in El Paso County that deals with the takings issue, which challenges the right of counties to ban dispensaries under the legislation," he says. "That's one of the main issues in our case as well, so they may take it up before ours. We'll see."

Look below to read the petition -- all 58 pages of it -- and 240 pages of supporting material.

http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2011/01/medical_marijuana_supreme_court_rejects_petition.php?page=2


--------------------

:Awemush::happyweed::fasted::happyweed::Awemush:


http://www.clear-uk.org/


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

Feedback and Administration >> Growery News Service

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Before it's law, medical-marijuana bill already triggering challenges Dephect 709 0 05/30/10 05:11 AM
by Dephect
* Court Rules on Marijuana SpaceMonkey 753 0 04/18/10 04:00 AM
by SpaceMonkey
* US: A push for legalizing medicinal marijuana in Arkansas Shaggy420 1,009 1 01/13/11 10:01 PM
by jaybris
* Medical Pot Court Fight?(co) SpaceMonkey 600 0 05/12/10 01:39 AM
by SpaceMonkey
* Colorado Medical Marijuana Bill Poised To Clear Final Legislative Hurdles SpaceMonkey 905 0 05/08/10 03:52 PM
by SpaceMonkey
* Colorado's top DEA agent says medical-pot growers following the law aren't worth raiding FurrowedBrowM 1,226 3 04/07/10 11:54 AM
by juke adro
* US: Missoula District Court: Jury pool in marijuana case stages mutiny Shaggy420 2,313 10 01/01/11 06:20 PM
by muse42
* Colorado Lawmakers Pass Marijuana Regulations SpaceMonkey 875 1 05/11/10 11:05 PM
by Triptonic

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: geokills
729 topic views. 0 members, 13 guests and 8 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Seedsman.com
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2016 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.031 seconds spending 0.001 seconds on 13 queries.